Internet Censorship Essay Example for Free

Internet Censorship EssayTh capacity of th information suprhighway has xplodd in th rcnt yars. It ncompasss th ast and th wst, th land and th sa, and anything our human mind could dram of. This is a good thing, redress? With th knowldg of th world just on ons fingrtips, it must b good, office? Sur, if it is usd th right way. A saying gos lik this, alike much of a good thing is bad. It is tru. Th Intrnt dos accommodat a galvanic pile of information. In a way, it has too much information. The Internet contains certain information that we DONT want bush league to have access of.Some of these unwanted information might be pornography, gambling, and somewhat sensitive issues like homosexuality. So what do we do about the stuff that we dont minors to see? Do we just make some law and erase it from our precious Internet? none First of all, this would be impossible to do because there is just too much unwanted information. wink of all, this would defeat the purpose of the Inter net. In the article The On personal line of credit Cooperative Publishing Act, it called the Internet the manifestation of humankinds quest for limitless two-way fundamental interaction with thought (Cooperative internet).Since there is a vague line of what is appropriate and what isnt, why should there be a straight-cut line of what things should be banned on the Internet. at that place should be a loose regulation on the content of the Internet that would encourage to a greater extent interaction with this rattling(prenominal) tool. Instead of the government dictating what minors should see, parents and teachers should be the ones stepping up and TEACHING minors whats right and whats wrong. To maximize the productivity of the Internet, there must be a repose of restriction and put outdom.When that balance is reached, the Internet will fully flourish. Why should we protect the Internet? Why should we protect all those fully grown websites? you might ask. The Internet is a won derful thing. Even the heads of our nation, the President and Vice President, believe that the Internet is a powerful educational tool for our children (Family internet). It should not be viewed as an evil thing. Its unique ability to bind the worlds knowledge together fulfills any questioners dream.There is no more need to visit dozens of libraries to find everything one needs. Everything is at ones fingertips. Without a doubt, unretentive minors wouldnt need the Internet to do research they dont have any research paper due. One mustnt forget the Internet is not just for research academically. It could be utilise to research recreationally. One back tooth research on topic of his interest. A teen male can research about cars. A mom can research on recipes. And a little kid can research on his favorite Disney character.Because of the Internet, a kid can do a lot more things kids before didnt have the privilege of. A kid can know anything and everything nearly the world, and e ven out of this world, without leaving the comfort of his home. Anything, anything at all. If the Internet is censored, a large amount of these wonderful knowledge will not be accessible anymore. Although security review does not mean a sweep through ban, there is no measure at the present that can effectively restrict access and facilitate not block out good website.According to a study done by electronic Privacy Information Center, the filtering programs block 95-99 percent of the material available on the Internet that might be of interest to young people (Faulty internet). I am not defending the protection of big websites. Neither am I advocating an easier access to pornography. I just want to point out the particular that websites dedicated to pornography is only a very small percentage of the Internet. If we use the inefficient censorship products out there, we will miss out a lot of the goods that the Internet has to offer. The coercive Court believes the same.When the unconditional Court struck down the Communication Decency Act in 1996, it found that the interest in further freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship (Faulty internet). So, should we sacrifice all the goods that the Internet could offer for those measly pornography websites? The Supreme Court shared the same vision for an uncensored Internet when it struck down the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that outlawed indecent communications online. In the ruling, it declared the Internet a free speech zone.